Legend: Definitions, Terms, <Text>, [IPA], -Tags-, and "Glosses".
The interpretation of a number prefix depends on whether the word form is a noun (aspect/mood is Nom-) or not. If it's a noun (or a pronoun), the number is the cardinality of a set of referents. If it's a verb, number is pluractional, referring to the number of occurrences. For nouns, polarity is a question of membership in the set.
The usages of the aspects and moods other than nominal are as follows:
Evidentiality is either direct (Wit-) or indirect (everything else). Unmarked evidentiality is assumed to be reported (Hrs-) unless the verb's obviative participant is 1st person (in a statement) or 2nd person (in a question), in which case it's direct (except if the aspect/mood is future; here, it must be indirect).
The 1st person proximative and obviative prefixes refer to the speaker and any associated persons, possibly including addressees. The 2nd person prefixes refer to addressees and any associated persons excluding the speaker. The 3rd person prefixes refer all other specified persons. If no obviative person is specified, the unspecified prefix is used (this is the default). The reflexive obviative prefix has the same referent as the proximative person, which may be explicit (finite or copular), implicitly 2nd person (imperative), or implicitly coreferential (attributive or phrasal).
Note: these terms are not optimal.
Except for class 1 verbs, unmarked grammatical voice is direct. Here, direct means that the proximative and obviative arguments have the semantic roles specified in the verb class table while inverse means that the roles are swapped.
Argument structure is quasi-derivational. Active is the normal interpretation. Autocausative assigns the ergative role as well as the dative or absolutive role (depending on the verb's class) to the proximative argument (assuming direct voice).
page started: 2016.Jan.10 Sun
current date: 2016.Jan.10 Sun
content and form originated by qiihoskeh
Table of Contents