Note: Some of the things covered here should probably be elsewhere.
- Some Inflectional Categories
- Personal Inflections
- Role Inversion
- Imperative Mood
- Argument Affixes
- Argument-2 Person Prefixes
- Other Personal Affixes
- Syntactical Category Suffixes
- Non-Primary Agreement Suffixes
- Pronouns
- The Copula
- Primary Forms of the Copula
- Negative and Interrogative Primary Forms
- Secondary Forms of the Copula
- Noun Agreement
Most inflected words in K'tle mark agreement in some fashion with one, two, or three arguments (depending on the word's argument structure). The arguments are labeled Argument-1, Argument-2, and Argument-3, which will be covered in the Argument Affixes section below.
Arguments (whether of verbs or nouns) distinguish person (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) and number (singular and plural). The 1st person plural distinguishes between inclusive (i.e. at least one addressee is referred to in addition to the speaker and any others) and exclusive (no addressees are referred to). The 3rd person distinguishes indefinite from definite (usually pragmatically, but sometimes logically); only the definite forms distinguish number.
There's also a coreferential person, which also doesn't distinguish number; for most purposes, it can be considered an additional kind of 3rd person.
Tag | Person and Number | Group |
---|---|---|
1S | 1st person Singular | Local |
1XP | 1st person eXclusive Plural | |
1NP | 1st person iNclusive Plural | |
2S | 2nd person Singular | |
2P | 2nd person Plural | |
3S | 3rd person definite Singular | Non-Local |
3P | 3rd person definite Plural | |
Ind | 3rd person Indefinite (number not distinguished) | |
Cor | Coreferential person (number not distinguished except when theme) |
Finally, it's useful to classify 1NP as 2nd person most of the time instead of as 1st person.
K'tle uses a hierarchical alignment: specifically 2nd > 1st > 3rd. This means that the 2nd person (including 1NP) appears only as Argument-2 on words which have both Argument-1 and Argument-2, and that the 1st person appears as Argument-1 on the same words only if Argument-2 is 2nd person.
Each argument has a specific role, the assignment being based on the most likely usage: except for nouns and relational verbs, Argument-2 is used for agent-like roles (more often than not) and Argument-1 for patient-like roles. Words with this kind of role assignment are said to have direct forms.
The roles for relational verbs are called "subject" and "object"; those for possessed nouns are "possessum" and "possessor". Non-possessed nouns have only a "subject" role.
Combined with the hierarchy, this means that 2nd persons are expected to act like agents and 1st persons are as well except with 2nd persons. When this isn't the case, inverse forms, which swap the roles used for Argument-1 and Argument-2 must be used.
Without going into details, inverse can be used as well as direct when both the arguments are 3rd person.
There are also reciprocal forms for those cases where the predicate is simultaneously direct and inverse.
Tag | Role Inversion |
---|---|
Dir | Direct (always zero-marked) |
Inv | Inverse |
Rec | Reciprocal |
I should mention at some point that 2nd person and 1st person can each be marked only once on a word (1NP also not occurring with 1st person either) and multiple 3rd persons arguments must have different referents. If Argument-1 and Argument-2 are to have the same referent, a reflexive form must be used.
There is also an imperative versus non-imperative mood distinction, relevent here only due to the interaction between person, inversion, and mood prefixes.
Tag | Mood |
---|---|
NIM | Non-Imperative Mood (always zero-marked) |
Imp | Imperative mood |
Except for special cases, Argument-1 is marked using suffixes, while Argument-2 and Argument-3 are marked using prefixes, with Argument-2 first.
The table below shows the personal agreement prefixes for Argument-2, excluding the partitive prefixes, which are given in the next section (despite technically being Argument-2 prefixes). Besides person and number, these prefixes also specify inversion (where relevent) and whether the mood is imperative or not. Under Non-Imperative Inverse, the second column is used for relational verbs and possessed nouns, while the first column is used for transitive and trivalent verbs. The rare imperative inverse forms of relational verbs aren't shown, as they consist of the direct imperative prefixes plus {ma-} |ma-|.
Non-Imperative | Imperative | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct | Inverse | Reciprocal | Direct | Inverse | Reciprocal | ||
1S- | k'-, ko- | kia- | k'ma- | k'nok(o)- | koz-, k'zo- | kiaz(o)- | konkoz-, k'nokzo- |
1XP- | ko̅- | ko̅ca- | ko̅ma- | ko̅nk(o)- | ko̅z(o)- | ko̅caz(o)- | ko̅nkoz(o)- |
1NP- | ta̅- | ta̅ca- | ta̅ma- | ta̅nk(o)- | ta̅z(o)- | ta̅caz(o)- | ta̅nkoz(o)- |
2S- | c(e)- | cea- | cma- | cnok(o)- | z(o)- | caz(o)- | nokoz-, nokzo- |
2P- | ca̅- | ca̅ca- | ca̅ma- | ca̅nk(o)- | az(o)- | eaz(o)- | ankoz(o)- |
3S- | 0-; h(e)- | ca- | ma- | nok(o)- | hez(o)- | heaz(o)- | henkoz(o)- |
3P- | a-; ha̅- | ea- | ama- | ank(o)- | ha̅z(o)- | ha̅caz(o)- | ha̅nkoz(o)- |
Cor- | me- | mea- | mema- | menk(o)- | mez(o)- | meaz(o)- | menkoz(o)- |
Ind- | ni- | nia- | nima- | nink(o)- | niz(o)- | ? | ninkoz(o)- |
For this section and the next, suffixes with vowels in parentheses are used with stems with final consonants while those without are used on stems with final vowels.
Tag | Partitive | Argument-3 | Argument-1 | Tag | Partitive | Argument-3 | Argument-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1S | • | • | -k(o) | 1XP | ki̅- | • | -ki̅ |
1NP | te̅- | • | -te̅ | ||||
2S | • | • | -c(e) | 2P | ce̅- | • | -ce̅ |
3S | ha-; 0- | p'-, pe- | w-a (1) | 3P | he̅-; i- | pa̅- | w-e̅ (1) |
Ind | • | 0- | -a, -n, -ni | (1) see W-Grade in Stem Grades | |||
Cor | me̅- | (2) | • | (2) same as 3S- or 3P-, depending on number | |||
Rfx | • | • | -ci' |
The choice of suffix for -Ind depends on the stem:
The significance of these suffixes is purely syntactical. They're appended to finite forms immediately after the Argument-1 suffix (or to the stem if the word lacks Argument-1).
Tag | Suffix | Description | Syntactical Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
-Con | -q, -qi | -£(i) | Adjunctivizer | Secondary |
-Nom | -z, -zo | -z(o) | Nominalizer | Nominal |
These suffixes mark agreement (or the lack of it) in addition to marking the syntactical category. All of them preempt Argument-1 marking (or Argument-2 where Argument-1 can't occur). Most of them can also have referents, however indirectly, and so can be thought of as 3rd person argument suffixes (besides having syntactical significance). The adverb suffix (-Adv) can be thought of as being either impersonal or coreferential, whichever makes more sense.
Tag | Suffix | Description | Syntactical | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
-PCD | -0, -£(i) (1) | Patient-Coreferent Depictive | Secondary | (1) -PCD is -0 except on nouns and agentive verbs |
-ACD | -m(e) | Agent-Coreferent Depictive | ||
-Rsl | -pa | Resultative | ||
-AMA | -to̅m (2) | Active Manner Adverb | (2) -- changed -- | |
-PMA | -to̅ (2) | Passive Manner Adverb | ||
-Inf | -mez | Infinitive | Nominal | |
-AniS | -la, l-a (3) | Animate Singular | Participial | (3) see below |
-AniP | -ka | Animate Plural | ||
-InaS | -za | Inanimate Singular | ||
-InaP | -na, -ma (4) | Inanimate Plural | (4) see below | |
-ThmS | -p(e)za | Thematic (inanimate) Singular | (5) -ThmP might be -p'na, -pena instead | |
-ThmP | -pa̅na (5) | Thematic (inanimate) Plural |
Possibly, there's also a thematic depictive, whose theme coreferences the host's patient? It (-TDP) would probably be marked |-p(e)|.
Personal pronouns are essentially verbal, being participial forms of the copula. As with noun phrases, there are no case distinctions. Personal pronouns are used only when topical, conjoined, intensive, or contrastively focused. The partitive personal pronouns are formed similarly, but use the partitive prefixes.
The personal pronouns and the corresponding partitive pronouns are shown in the table below, along with the partitive determiner forms:
Group | Singular Pronouns | Plural Pronouns | Gender | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tag | Personal | Partitive | Tag | Personal | Partitive | ||||
Local | 1S | k'la | • | • | 1XP | ko̅ka | ki̅la | ki̅ka | |
1NP | ta̅ka | te̅la | te̅ka | ||||||
2S | cla | • | • | 2P | ca̅ka | ce̅la | ce̅ka | ||
Non-Local | 3S | hla | • | • | 3P | ha̅ka | he̅la | he̅ka | animate |
determiner= | ila | ika | |||||||
heza | heza | hna | ha̅na | he̅za | he̅na | inanimate | |||
determiner= | za | na | determiner= | iza | ina |
The personal pronouns take the expected agreement, except when contrastively focused, in which case the agreement is either 3S or 3P, depending on context.
Group | Singular Pronouns | Plural Pronouns | Gender | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tag | Personal | Tag | Personal | |||
Local | 1S | kianla | kianka | 1XP | ko̅canka | |
1NP | ta̅canka | |||||
2S | ceanla | ceanka | 2P | ca̅canka | ||
Non-Local | 3S | heanla | heanka | 3P | ha̅canka | animate |
canla | canka | eanka | ||||
heanza | heanna | ha̅canna | inanimate | |||
canza | canna | eanna |
Unlike elsewhere in K'tle , where referents are divided into animate or inanimate or not classified at all, certain pronouns distinguish human and non-human instead; these are the content question pronouns (Que), used for "who(m)", "what", etc., the coreferential pronouns (Cor), the indefinite pronoun (Ind), and the universal quantifier (Uni), which acts like a pronoun.
The content question and coreferential pronouns have partitive forms as well, which are divided into animate and inanimate. The content question pronouns and universal quantifier also have participial forms used as determiners; the latter is divided into animate and inanimate, but the former makes the human and non-human distinction as well.
All of these pronominal and participial forms are shown in the table below:
Content Question | Coreferential | Division | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tag | Pron | Participial | Partitive | Tag | Pron | Partitive | ||||
Que | xo̅ | xo̅la | xo̅ka | xe̅la | xe̅ka | Cor | mo̅ | me̅la | me̅ka | human |
xa̅ | xa̅la | xa̅ka | ma̅ | non-human animate | ||||||
xa̅za | xa̅na | xe̅za | xe̅na | me̅za | me̅na | inanimate | ||||
Universal Quantifier | Indefinite | Division | ||||||||
Tag | Pron | Participial | Tag | Pron | ||||||
Uni | te̅n | • | tenka | Ind | ni̅ | human | ||||
te̅na | ne̅ | non-human animate | ||||||||
tenza | ten̅a | inanimate |
The copula in K'tle is used for identity, definition, and existence. It's somewhat peculiar in that its root is phonetically null and its finite forms consist entirely of polarity, agreement marking, and syntactical function marking. The participial forms have already been given above in Pronouns; what remains are the primary and secondary forms.
The copula is a defective relational verb. It has two sets of primary forms: one for the copula of identity and the other for the copula of definition and existence.
The copula of identity is inherently reciprocal and consists of the Argument-2 personal prefixes added to the definite 3rd person Argument-1 suffixes; forms which identify the 2nd person with the 1st person don't exist. In addition, only forms where the prefix agrees in number with the suffix exist.
The copula of definition and existence consists of the Argument-2 personal prefixes added to an indefinite 3rd person Argument-1 suffix. If there's a phrase elaborating Argument-1 (usually appearing after the copula), the referent for Argument-2 is defined as a subset of the referent of Argument-1. If there's no such elaborating phrase, the copula is one of existence. The copula of definition is used only when the defining phrase contains at least one attributive qualifier if a noun is present and at least two attributive qualifiers otherwise.
Identity | Definition & Existence | Group | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |||||
1S | koa | 1XP | ko̅he̅ | 1S | kon | 1XP | ko̅n | Local |
1NP | ta̅he̅ | 1NP | ta̅n | |||||
2S | coa | 2P | ca̅he̅ | 2S | cen | 2P | ca̅n | |
3S | ha | 3P | oe̅ | 3S | ni | 3P | an | Non-Local |
Ind | nin | |||||||
Cor- | moa- (*) | Cor- | men- (*) |
Theoretically, there are also partitive forms, where a definite 3rd person referent (Argument-1) is defined as a part or subset of some other referent (Argument-2, using the partitive prefixes). Since I'm not sure they're actually in use, I've left them out. In any event, the copula of definition can be used with a partitive phrase.
As with the corresponding basic (positive) forms, a Cor- (coreferential) form here must take one of the syntactical category suffixes.
Identity | Definition & Existence | Group | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |||||
1S | kio̅na | 1XP | ko̅co̅ne̅ | 1S | kianni | 1XP | ko̅canni | Local |
1NP | ta̅co̅ne̅ | 1NP | ta̅canni | |||||
2S | ceo̅na | 2P | ca̅co̅ne̅ | 2S | ceanni | 2P | ca̅canni | |
3S | co̅na | 3P | eo̅ne̅ | 3S | canni | 3P | eanni | Non-Local |
Ind | nianni | |||||||
Cor- | meo̅na- (*) | Cor- | meanni- (*) |
Identity | Definition & Existence | Group | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Singular | Plural | Singular | Plural | |||||
1S | koo̅xa | 1XP | ko̅ho̅xe̅ | 1S | koaxni | 1XP | ko̅haxni | Local |
1NP | ta̅ho̅xe̅ | 1NP | ta̅haxni | |||||
2S | coo̅xa | 2P | ca̅ho̅xe̅ | 2S | coaxni | 2P | ca̅haxni | |
3S | ho̅xa | 3P | oo̅xe̅ | 3S | haxni | 3P | oaxni | Non-Local |
Ind | noaxni | |||||||
Cor | moo̅xa- (*) | Cor | moaxni- (*) |
The copula may also have negative participial forms. Also, I'm not sure if the interrogative coreferential forms are actually used.
The copula has no regular infinitive (-Inf), but nominalized coreferential forms can be used as infinitives. Likewise, there's no regular patient-depictive (-PCD) form, but adjunctivized coreferential forms can be used as such. The agent-depictive (-ACD) form is {mem} |mem| and the resultative (-Rsl) form is {mepa} |mepa|. Like the copula of definition and existence, these all have limited use.
Are there any non-3rd person secondary forms?
Besides the possessors of obligatorily possessed nouns, the only nominal inflection category is number. Number is either singular or plural and is distinguished only for count nouns, not mass nouns. The singular (.S) is the basic form. The choice of suffix for -P depends on the stem:
page started: 2009.Mar.10 Tue
prior version: 2009.Apr.15 Wed
prior version: 2009.Oct.20 Tue
last modified: 2010.Mar.21 Sun
content and form originated by qiihoskeh
Table of Contents